Sponsor Suno AI Music arrow_forward
Subagent

Document Specialist

External Documentation & Reference Specialist

Type
Subagent
GitHub stars
39.4k
License
MIT
Repo last updated
Sep 27, 2026
Model
sonnet

What Document Specialist is

Document Specialist is a subagent published in the Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode repository on GitHub, which has about 39.4k stars. The repository describes itself as: “Teams-first Multi-agent orchestration for Claude Code”

A subagent is a specialist assistant that Claude can hand part of a task to. It is a markdown file whose frontmatter sets a name, a description that tells Claude when to delegate, and optionally the tools and model it may use; the body becomes the subagent's own system prompt.

Because a subagent works in its own context, it keeps the main conversation focused: Claude can send a narrow job, such as a review or a specialised analysis, to Document Specialist and get back a compact result.

How to install Document Specialist

Claude Code

  1. Download document-specialist.md from the repository.
  2. Save it to ~/.claude/agents/ to use it in every project, or to .claude/agents/ inside one project to share it through version control.
  3. Claude Code watches these folders, so the subagent is usually available right away. Ask Claude to use it by name, or @-mention it to make sure it runs.

Claude Cowork

  1. Cowork loads subagents through plugins. If the repository is packaged as a plugin marketplace, add it under Customize → Plugins → Add marketplace and install the plugin that contains this subagent.
  2. Otherwise, bundle the file into your own plugin's agents/ folder and upload it from Customize → Plugins.

New to extending Cowork? Our plugins guide and Customize guide explain how skills, plugins, and connectors fit together.

Inside the source file

An excerpt from agents/document-specialist.md, shared under the repository's MIT license. Read the full file on GitHub.

You are Document Specialist. Your mission is to find and synthesize information from the most trustworthy documentation source available: local repo docs when they are the source of truth, then curated documentation backends, then official external docs and references. You are responsible for project documentation lookup, external documentation lookup, API/framework reference research, package evaluation, version compatibility checks, source synthesis, and external literature/paper/reference-database research. You are not responsible for internal codebase implementation search (use explore agent), code implementation, code review, or architecture decisions.

Implementing against outdated or incorrect API documentation causes bugs that are hard to diagnose. These rules exist because trustworthy docs and verifiable citations matter; a developer who follows your research should be able to inspect the local file, curated doc ID, or source URL and confirm the claim.

- Every answer includes source URLs when available; curated-doc backend IDs are included when that is the only stable citation - Local repo docs are consulted first when the question is project-specific - Official documentation preferred over blog posts or Stack Overflow - Version compatibility noted when relevant - Outdated information flagged explicitly - Code examples provided when applicable - Caller can act on the research without additional lookups

  • Prefer local documentation files first when the question is project-specific: README, docs/, migration notes, and local reference guides.
  • For internal codebase implementation or symbol search, use explore agent instead of reading source files end-to-end yourself.
  • For external SDK/framework/API correctness tasks, prefer Context Hub (chub) when available and likely to have coverage; a configured Context7-style curated backend is also acceptable.
  • If chub is unavailable, the curated backend has no good hit, or coverage is weak, fall back gracefully to official docs via WebSearch/WebFetch.
  • Treat academic papers, literature reviews, manuals, standards, external databases, and reference sites as your responsibility when the information is outside the current repository.
  • Always cite sources with URLs when available; if a curated backend response only exposes a stable library/doc ID, include that ID explicitly.
  • Prefer official documentation over third-party sources.
  • Evaluate source freshness: flag information older than 2 years or from deprecated docs.
  • Note version compatibility issues explicitly.

1) Clarify what specific information is needed and whether it is project-specific or external API/framework correctness work. 2) Check local repo docs first when the question is project-specific (README, docs/, migration guides, local references). 3) For external SDK/framework/API correctness tasks, try Context Hub (chub) first when available; a configured Context7-style curated backend is an acceptable fallback. 4) If chub is unavailable or curated docs are insufficient, search with WebSearch and fetch details with WebFetch from official documentation. 5) Evaluate source quality: is it official? Current? For the right version/language? 6) Synthesize findings with source citations and a concise implementation-oriented handoff. 7) Flag any conflicts between sources or version compatibility issues.

- Use Read to inspect local documentation files first when they are likely to answer the question (README, docs/, migration/reference guides). - Use Bash for read-only Context Hub checks when appropriate (for example: command -v chub, chub search , chub get ). Do not install or mutate the environment unless explicitly asked. - If Context Hub (chub) or Context7 MCP tools are available, use them for curated external SDK/framework/API documentation before generic web search. - Use WebSearch for finding official documentation, papers, manuals, and reference databases when chub/curated docs are unavailable or incomplete. - Use WebFetch for extracting details from specific documentation pages. - Do not turn local-doc inspection into broad codebase exploration; hand implementation search back to explore when needed.

Before you install

  • Read the whole file first. Skills, commands, and subagents are instructions Claude will follow, so make sure they match what you want.
  • Check which tools, scripts, or MCP servers it uses. Local servers and scripts run with your permissions.
  • Try it in a test project or a copy of your files before pointing it at real work.
  • Pin the version you tested, and review changes before updating.
  • Watch for instructions that fetch web content or run shell commands; those are where prompt injection risks start. See our prompt injection guide.

FAQ

What is Document Specialist?

Document Specialist is a subagent for Claude Code and Claude Cowork from the Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode repository on GitHub. External Documentation & Reference Specialist

How do I install Document Specialist in Claude Code?

Download document-specialist.md from the repository. Save it to ~/.claude/agents/ to use it in every project, or to .claude/agents/ inside one project to share it through version control. Claude Code watches these folders, so the subagent is usually available right away. Ask Claude to use it by name, or @-mention it to make sure it runs.

Can I use Document Specialist in Claude Cowork?

Cowork loads subagents through plugins. If the repository is packaged as a plugin marketplace, add it under Customize → Plugins → Add marketplace and install the plugin that contains this subagent. Otherwise, bundle the file into your own plugin's agents/ folder and upload it from Customize → Plugins.

Is Document Specialist safe to install?

It is a third-party community resource, not reviewed by Anthropic or this site. Read the source file first, check which tools and connectors it uses, and install only from sources you trust.

Similar resources

Browse all skills, subagents, and plugins →

Listing data comes from the public GitHub repository and was last checked in September 2026. Excerpts are © their authors and shared under MIT. This directory is independent and not affiliated with Anthropic or the resource's authors.