Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5: What Changed and Which Model to Use
Anthropic shipped two models in one week. Claude Opus 5.5 arrived on September 22, 2026, performing at the level of the pricier Claude Fable 5.1 while costing less to run than the Opus 5 it replaces. Claude Sonnet 5.5 followed on September 28 as a faster, cheaper complement. Together they open the Claude 5.5 family, with Haiku 5.5 promised in the coming weeks.
If you use Claude Cowork, the practical question is which one to pick in the model picker for each job. This guide compares Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 on price, speed, context, and benchmarks, then maps them to common Cowork tasks. Developers will find model IDs and migration notes near the end.
Updated October 5, 2026
Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 at a glance
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | September 22, 2026 | September 28, 2026 |
| API price | $4 input / $20 output per million tokens | $2 input / $10 output per million tokens |
| Cache reads | $0.20 per million tokens | $0.20 per million tokens |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Speed | Moderate | Fast |
| Thinking | Adaptive, always on | Adaptive |
| Default API effort | Medium | High |
| Replaces | Opus 5 | Sonnet 5 |
| Model ID | claude-opus-5-5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
Both models read text and images, use tools, and share a June 2026 knowledge cutoff. Anthropic's own advice for developers is to start with Opus 5.5 for most workloads, and to move up to Claude Fable 5.1 only for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agent work.
What is new in Claude Opus 5.5
Opus 5.5 is the headline release. Anthropic says it matches Fable 5.1 on most work, costs about 40% less than Opus 5 on typical workloads, and generates output about 30% faster. The list price also fell, from $5 to $4 per million input tokens and from $25 to $20 per million output tokens.
| Benchmark | Opus 5.5 | Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (agentic terminal work) | 66.4% | 52.3% |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (coding) | 54.4% | 48.0% |
| CursorBench 4.0 (coding in an editor) | 57.8% | 46.6% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 (knowledge work, Elo) | 1846 | 1708 |
The knowledge-work score is the one most relevant to Cowork. GDPval-style tests grade real deliverables such as reports, analyses, and spreadsheets, and a jump of more than 130 Elo points is large for a single release. Opus 5.5 also scored 81.8% on OSWorld 2.1, a test of operating a computer through its screen, which matters if you use computer use in Cowork.
Safeguards that change behavior
- Cybersecurity requests are routed to Claude Opus 4.8 rather than answered by Opus 5.5, unless the organization is in Anthropic's Cyber Verification Program.
- Biology safeguards match Fable 5.1. Deeper life-sciences research requires the Life Sciences Verification Program.
- Thinking cannot be turned off. Opus 5.5 always uses adaptive thinking; you steer how hard it thinks with the effort setting.
- Fast mode is available on the API at $8 input and $40 output per million tokens for latency-sensitive work.
Opus 5.5 is available on Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, in Claude Code, in Claude Cowork, and on the Claude API, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
What is new in Claude Sonnet 5.5
Sonnet 5.5 keeps Sonnet 5's list price of $2 input and $10 output per million tokens but does more for it: Anthropic reports output that is over 30% faster and a cost per task up to 30% lower than Sonnet 5. In Claude's apps and Claude Code, its default effort is Medium; on the API it defaults to High.
Anthropic positions Sonnet 5.5 as strongest at well-scoped everyday tasks, fixing bugs, and creating polished documents, slides, and spreadsheets. That last point makes it a natural fit for Claude Docs and Claude Slides, which launched the same month.
Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5: benchmarks side by side
| Benchmark | Opus 5.5 | Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 66.4% | 70.6% |
| FrontierCode v1.1 | 54.4% | 46.2% |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 57.8% | 55.5% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 (Elo) | 1846 | 1844 |
| OSWorld 2.1 (partial) | 81.8% | 80.1% |
The surprise is how close the two are. Sonnet 5.5 edges ahead on Terminal-Bench and is essentially tied with Opus 5.5 on the GDPval knowledge-work test, at half the price. Opus 5.5 keeps a clear lead on FrontierCode, the hardest coding benchmark in the set, which tracks with Anthropic's framing: Opus for complex work requiring careful judgment, Sonnet for well-scoped tasks.
Which model to use for Cowork tasks
In the merged Claude app, the model picker sits where it always has, so you can switch per conversation. A practical default for most people is Sonnet 5.5 for routine work and Opus 5.5 when the task is long, ambiguous, or high stakes.
| Task | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Inbox triage, meeting prep, daily briefings | Sonnet 5.5 | Well-scoped and frequent; speed and lower usage matter more than depth |
| Turning notes into a doc or deck | Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic calls out documents, slides, and spreadsheets as a strength |
| Recurring scheduled tasks | Sonnet 5.5 | Runs every day or week, so efficiency adds up |
| Multi-source research report with judgment calls | Opus 5.5 | Long, ambiguous work where careful reasoning pays off |
| Financial models and contract review | Opus 5.5 | High stakes; errors are costly |
| Long computer-use sessions | Opus 5.5 | Slightly higher OSWorld score, and long sessions reward careful judgment |
| Hardest coding and multi-day agent projects | Fable 5.1 | Anthropic's top tier for long-horizon work |
Both models draw on your plan's usage limits, and a bigger model at higher effort uses more of your allowance per task. If you hit limits often, move routine and scheduled work to Sonnet 5.5 first. Our pricing guide explains how the plans compare, and the merge explainer covers where settings moved in the new app.
Effort matters as much as the model
Both models think adaptively, and the effort setting controls how much. On a well-defined task, raising effort on Sonnet 5.5 is often a cheaper fix than switching to Opus 5.5, and Opus 5.5 at its default medium effort is usually enough for a first draft. If results disappoint, raise effort before switching models.
Switching from Opus 5 or Sonnet 5: a checklist
New models usually arrive as the default for new conversations, but work you set up earlier does not always move with them. Before you assume everything now runs on the new generation, walk through these checks:
- Open each scheduled task and confirm which model it uses. A task created months ago may still name an older model, and it will keep running on it while that model is available.
- Rerun your three most common tasks on the new model next to the old one. Compare the result, the time it took, and how much of your usage it consumed. Keep notes; one honest comparison beats a dozen benchmark tables.
- Reread your instructions and skills. Standing instructions written to work around an older model's habits, such as reminders to double-check a format, may no longer be needed and just add noise.
- Watch the usage meter for a week. Faster output and lower cost per task should stretch your plan further, but heavier use of the bigger model can cancel that out.
- Tell your team what changed. If colleagues share skills or projects with you, agree on which model to use for shared recurring work so results stay consistent.
Developers have one extra step: older model IDs keep working until their retirement dates, so nothing breaks the day a new model launches. Pin the new ID in a test environment, run your evaluation set, and only then switch production traffic. Anthropic publishes a migration guide for moving to the new Opus, which lists the parameters that changed between generations.
Where Fable 5.1 and Haiku fit
| Model | API price (input / output) | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | $10 / $50 | Demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $4 / $20 | Long-running agentic coding and knowledge work |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $2 / $10 | The best mix of speed and intelligence |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | $1 / $5 | The fastest model for simple, high-volume work |
Haiku 5.5 has been announced for the coming weeks but was not out as of early October 2026. Until it ships, Haiku 4.5 remains the budget option, with a 200K-token context window and a retirement date no sooner than October 15, 2026. Mythos 5.1, Anthropic's most capable model, is limited to vetted organizations; our Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 guide explains the access programs.
Notes for developers and admins
- Model IDs:
claude-opus-5-5andclaude-sonnet-5-5on the Claude API, Microsoft Foundry, and Google Cloud;anthropic.claude-opus-5-5andanthropic.claude-sonnet-5-5on Amazon Bedrock. - Thinking: both use adaptive thinking steered by the effort parameter. The older extended-thinking mode with a fixed token budget is not accepted on these models.
- Caching: Opus 5.5 cache reads cost 5% of the base input price ($0.20); Sonnet 5.5 cache reads cost 10% ($0.20). Batch requests are 50% off.
- Long outputs: both allow 128K output tokens on the Messages API, and up to 300K on the Batches API with a beta header.
- Lifecycle: Anthropic commits to keeping Opus 5.5 until at least September 22, 2027, and Sonnet 5.5 until at least September 28, 2027.
For teams building their own agents on these models rather than using Cowork, our Managed Agents guide covers Anthropic's hosted option. Enterprise admins rolling out new models can start with our enterprise deployment guide.
Frequently asked questions
When was Claude Opus 5.5 released?
expand_more
September 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5 followed on September 28, 2026.
How much does Opus 5.5 cost?
expand_more
On the API, $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, down from $5 and $25 for Opus 5. On Claude plans it is included in Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise and draws on usage limits.
How much does Sonnet 5.5 cost?
expand_more
$2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, the same list price as Sonnet 5, with a cost per task up to 30% lower.
Is Opus 5.5 better than Sonnet 5.5?
expand_more
For complex, ambiguous, or high-stakes work, usually yes, and it leads clearly on the hardest coding benchmark. On everyday tasks, knowledge work, and terminal work, Sonnet 5.5 is about as good at half the price.
Is Opus 5.5 as good as Fable 5.1?
expand_more
Anthropic says Opus 5.5 matches Fable 5.1 on most work at a lower price. Fable 5.1 remains the choice for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agent tasks.
What is the context window of Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5?
expand_more
Both have a 1M-token context window and up to 128K output tokens.
Can I use Opus 5.5 in Claude Cowork?
expand_more
Yes. Opus 5.5 is available in Cowork on paid plans. Choose it in the model picker for any conversation or task.
When is Haiku 5.5 coming?
expand_more
Anthropic said Haiku 5.5 would arrive in the coming weeks after the Opus 5.5 launch. It had not been released as of early October 2026.